HADM 1361 · Fall 2026
Prelim 2 study guide
Prelim 2 covers Lectures 12 through 22. It is not cumulative: Prelim 1 already tested Lectures 1–11. Lecture 22 is the review session, so all the new material is in Lectures 12–21.
Date and timeTuesday, Nov 17 · 7:30 PM
RoomsMLT 228, MLT 251, MLT 253
SDS accommodated exam6:30 PM · Statler Hall 396
Points50 total
What the exam looks like
- About 30 points of multiple choice, true/false and matching. These mostly test concepts from Lectures 12–16 and 21.
- About 20 points of open-ended math problems. These test recipe costing (Lectures 17–18) and menu pricing (Lectures 19–20).
- Readings are tested only at the level of detail covered in class.
Bring to the exam
- A pencil and your Cornell ID
- A basic four-function or non-programmable calculator. Phones and programmable calculators are not allowed. Prof. Adalja will have some calculators to borrow.
Deadlines this week
| Day | What |
| Fri, Nov 13 · 11:59 PM | Knowledge Quiz 5 (Lectures 17–21) |
| Sun, Nov 15 · 11:59 PM | Costing & Pricing Problem Set (HW2) |
| Tue, Nov 17 · 7:30 PM | Prelim 2 |
How to study, in order
Menu pricing math. Learn the factor, prime cost and modified actual cost methods, then proportional vs. semi-proportional cost allocation. Start with the
Menu pricing guide.
Recipe costing math. Practice unit conversions, yields (APQ = EPQ ÷ yield %), Q-factors, portion cost and food cost %. Start with the
Recipe costing guide.
Work every practice problem on paper with a basic calculator before you look at the answers.
Read each lecture page and take its quiz. A green score in the sidebar means you've finished that quiz.
Every lecture on the exam
| Lecture | Topic | Type |
| 12 | Menu Development II | Concepts |
| 13 | Restaurant Psychology | Concepts |
| 14 | Marketing & Positioning | Concepts |
| 15 | Food Production Management | Concepts + small math |
| 16 | New Product Development | Concepts |
| 17 | Recipe Costing I & II | Math |
| 18 | Recipe Costing III | Math |
| 19 | Menu Pricing Theory | Math |
| 20 | Menu Pricing Practice | Math |
| 21 | Supply Chain, Purchasing & Receiving | Concepts |
Lecture 12 · Mon, Oct 5
Menu Development II
On the exam (from the review slides)
- À la carte vs. prix fixe menus
- How menu design differs across segments, and why
- Menu planning for onsite foodservice
- Sustainability in menu planning
- The menu planning process
À la carte vs. prix fixe
- À la carte: each item is priced and ordered separately.
- Table d'hôte (prix fixe): a multiple-course meal with limited choice at one fixed price.
- The menu communicates the operation's philosophy to the guest. Burger King: "quality food, served quickly, in attractive, clean surroundings." Thomas Keller: "One guest at a time."
Menus by segment
Each segment designs its menu around what its guests want.
Quick service
- Guests want: few choices, easy to understand, a short wait
- Philosophy: simply prepared food served fast at a reasonable price
- Presentation: light board with photos
Fast casual
- Guests want: high-quality food prepared fresh in view, a "healthy" image
- Philosophy: made on site, signature items, moderate variety, few daily changes
- Presentation: paper menu at the door, board over the counter
Midscale / theme
- Guests want: quality, flexible ordering, requests honored
- Philosophy: chef-prepared, daily specials, wide variety
- Presentation: menu at the table, often with kids' items
Fine dining
- Guests want: luxury ingredients, skilled cooking, staff who anticipate needs
- Philosophy: original recipes, unique items, pastry chef, sommelier
- Presentation: artistic, may change daily, separate wine and dessert menus
Menu labeling
- ACA Section 4205 (2010): chains with 20 or more locations must post calories for standard menu items. Other nutrition info must be available in writing on request.
- Cawley, Susskind & Willage (2018): labels cut calories ordered by 3.0%, in appetizers and entrées but not drinks or desserts. Seeing the labels raised support for labeling laws by 9.6%.
Onsite foodservice
- Healthcare: the challenge is making patients feel they're eating there by choice. Menus are regular/house, special/modified (ordered by a physician), or consistency-modified (liquid, puréed).
- Selective-cycle menu: planned for a period (a week, a month), then repeated, with limited choices.
- Restaurant-style menu: like room service. The patient calls to order from the same menu every day.
- K–12 schools: highly regulated. The National School Lunch Program is federally assisted, and meals must meet federal nutrition rules.
- Colleges: no regulation beyond normal restaurant rules. Wide variety, a focus on dietary restrictions, eco-friendly practices.
- Turnwall et al. (2019): taste-focused vegetable labels raised selection 29% over health-focused labels and 14% over basic labels.
Sustainability
- Source from renewable sources; buy local, seasonal and organic produce
- Build relationships with suppliers, and consider carbon footprint
- Market the menu accordingly (e.g., Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch)
The menu planning process
Menu planning: identify inputs, then the menu philosophy and categories, then the items in each category. Balance food, preparation, cost/price and organoleptic (taste, texture, look) variety.
Menu development: recipe R&D, calculate costs, set prices.
Menu design: design the menu card (gaze-motion studies, menu psychology).
Menu analysis: margin analysis and menu engineering.
Planning inputs: the guests; production and service capabilities (building, staff skills, equipment); the value chain (distributors, seasonality); and financial targets (COGS, recipe costing, waste).
Case recap: Domino's vs. Starbucks in Italy
- Domino's sold Americanized pizza in the birthplace of pizza and franchised through ePizza. Its delivery service wasn't strong enough to survive the pandemic.
- Starbucks said it was "not here to teach Italians how to make coffee." It waited decades to enter, grew slowly, roasted locally, and licensed to Percassi, a respected Italian company.
Lecture 13 · Wed, Oct 7
Restaurant Psychology
On the exam
- Menu choice: the traditional case for more choice, and why more isn't always better
- Menu design as a sales tool: conventional wisdom vs. research
- Gaze-motion studies, primacy vs. recency, price placement, the "sweet spot," highlighting items, item descriptions
How many choices?
- Guests often prefer fewer choices: the decision is easier, satisfaction is higher, and food costs fall.
- Johns & Hartwell (2013) surveyed 442 participants. For fine dining, about 5–7 choices per category felt "about right." For limited service, about 6–7 per category.
Ambiance levers
- Sound: volume and tempo control the pace of service
- Light: changing the intensity controls table turns
- Visuals: color and design attract and stimulate guests
- Furniture: attractive, but not too comfortable
- Scent: good smells please people waiting in line
Memory effects
- Serial position effect (primacy and recency): people remember the first and last items in a list best.
- Von Restorff effect: the item that stands out from the rest is the one remembered.
Does menu design actually sell? The four studies
1 · Is there a "sweet spot"?
The conventional gaze-motion view says the more often an item is seen, the more likely it is ordered. Yang (2012) tracked eye scanpaths and found no single sweet spot. If "sweet spot" means where guests look first, it's the upper-left corner of the first page.
2 · Does boxing or highlighting an item increase its sales?
Bowen & Morris (1995): no significant change in salad sales. But significantly more guests ordered soup along with their salad. Open questions: would it differ in limited service, and what role do servers play?
3 · Does hiding the price increase the average check?
Reynolds, Merritt & Pinckney (2005): no significant difference in average check.
4 · Do richer descriptions matter?
McCall & Lynn (2008) tested steak, chicken and pasta. More descriptive wording raised perceived quality for 3 of 3 items, expected price for 2 of 3, and purchase intent for 2 of 3.
Lecture 14 · Wed, Oct 14
Marketing & Positioning
On the exam
- Reach vs. frequency
- Types of market segmentation
- Why restaurant marketing is unique
- The geospatial approach and its basic steps
Reach vs. frequency
A marketing executive is accountable for customer traffic and sales. Traffic comes from two places:
Reach
Bringing in new customers.
Frequency
Getting the same customers to come back.
- 62% of restaurant sales come from returning guests, but 70% of customers visited only once in the past 6 months. The lesson: build a genuine connection.
- Why customers come back: great service (more important than the food), great food (quality and consistency), cleanliness, the place becoming part of their identity, and a genuine connection.
Market segmentation
- Demographic: who are they?
- Psychographic: what are their attitudes and aspirations?
- Behavioral: what do they do?
- One-to-one: what individual personal information (PII) do we have?
Why restaurant marketing is unique
- Franchising funds growth.
- High frequency: people eat several times a day.
- Geospatial: target customers are nearby.
- Predictable purchase cycle: you can know what customers eat and when.
The US chain industry was built on TV advertising, which made a local business too centralized. Social and mobile media are now disrupting that model.
Media measurement
- TV and radio: gross rating points (GRP) and targeted rating points (TRP), from Nielsen samples. It's hard to tie sales to a specific ad.
- Print, online and outdoor: impressions, clicks, redemptions.
Reaching new customers
- Target accurately
- Innovate the product or service (e.g., Burger King's Impossible Whopper)
- Manage online reputation: keep info consistent and respond to feedback
- Reach new guests through existing guests
The geospatial approach: six steps
- Identify a specific restaurant concept and location
- List the two main demand generators for the location
- List the customer segments for each demand generator
- List the two main customer segments living in the area
- Identify each segment's needs (from steps 3 and 4)
- Rate the restaurant against its competitors on each need
Next, turn each need into a message (e.g., speed of service becomes "under 30 minutes or your next meal is on us"). Then pick channels with the right mix of reach and frequency. The in-class Bella's Trattoria activity used this approach.
Lecture 15 · Mon, Oct 19
Food Production Management
On the exam
- Underage vs. overage, the critical ratio, and the method's weaknesses
- Menu prep: what it is, with examples
- Station prep: what it is, with examples
- What to consider when assigning menu items to stations
- Final production steps
Producing the right amount
Making too much raises COGS and fills storage. Making too little disappoints customers and loses revenue.
- Example (mine, not from class): an item sells for $6.00, costs $1.50, and has no salvage value. Cu = $4.50, Co = $1.50, so CR = 4.50 ÷ 6.00 = 75%. Make more.
Weaknesses of the method
- Ignores labor cost
- Needs more than 60 days of historical and forecasted demand
- Doesn't count the true cost of an unhappy customer (lost future visits, bad word of mouth)
- Ignores shelf life, prep time, and substitution
Menu prep vs. station prep
The goal of prep and production management is to make as much of each dish in advance as possible without hurting quality.
| Menu prep | Station prep |
| When | Hours to days before service | Right before service |
| Stations using it | Usually several | Usually one |
| Prep time | Often long | Usually short |
| Batch size | Large | Small |
| Shelf life | Usually more than a day | Often less than a day |
| Held | Cold or room temp, almost never hot | Hot, cold, or room temp |
| Equipment | Anything available | Station-specific |
| Examples | Bulk washing and cutting of produce, butchery, dressings, sauces, soups, sides, baked goods | Cutting and stocking for one station, reheating batch items, gathering tools |
To find the parts of a dish you can prep separately, look for sub-recipes, groups of ingredients, shelf-life cues ("can be made ahead," "marinate overnight"), and past-tense verbs ("chopped," "cooked").
Assigning menu items to stations
- Menu factors: the item's components, the cooking techniques, and what's prepped ahead vs. cooked to order (à la minute)
- Structural factors: each station's capacity, the attendants' skills, expected sales volume, and whether there's a dedicated prep team
- Example, steak frites: steak goes to the grill station, fries to the fry station, haricots verts to the sauté station.
Final production steps
Order in: the expeditor calls the order to the stations.
Fire: the expeditor tells the stations to start cooking.
Plate: the station plates, or passes the item along to be plated.
Inspect and garnish: the expeditor checks and finishes each plate.
Service: front-of-house staff take it to the guest.
Par and prep lists
Par is the amount of an item needed to meet expected demand for one service period. It's based on past sales plus a small buffer. Amount to prep = par − amount on hand. If on hand is more than par, prep zero.
Lecture 16 · Wed, Oct 21
New Product Development
On the exam
- The NPD process (flow diagram) and what happens at each step
- Strategic considerations
- Tactical considerations
- The four stages of a food trend; trend enablers vs. barriers
What counts as new product development
- A product the company has never made before, or
- An existing product presented or rebranded in a new form, package or label.
What drives NPD: consumer demand and trends; new technology; competition and the economy; regulation, the environment and society; and the product life cycle (development → introduction → growth → maturity → decline).
Limited time offers (LTOs)
- Boost sales and give a competitive edge
- Let suppliers test new products and concepts
- LTO buyers visit more often and are more valuable customers
- Spark sales before the end of a quarter, or test an item without a permanent menu commitment. If it flops, it disappears. If it's a hit, it can replace a slow seller.
The NPD process
Five stages. After each one, a gate decides go/no-go, or whether to set the idea aside or kill it. The process isn't strictly linear: teams can loop back.
| Stage | What happens | Deliverable |
| 1. Ideate | Brainstorm, vote on the best ideas, write idea forms | Idea portfolio |
| 2. Investigate | Market opportunity, target customers and needs, fit with technology, value proposition | Concept brief |
| 3. Develop | Standardized recipes, operating procedures, supply chain, distribution, financial check | Business case |
| 4. Test | Bench testing, sensory and objective evaluation, consumer tests and focus groups | Test reports |
| 5. Launch | Heavy promotion, monitor distribution, collect feedback, plan improvements | Launch plan |
Strategic vs. tactical considerations
Strategic
Is it good for our customers and our brand?
- Flavor and quality
- Trends
- Diets
- Nutrition
- Environmental sustainability
Tactical
Is it good for our business?
- Pricing and profit
- Ingredient availability
- Employee capability
- Facilities capacity
- Operational sustainability
Example from class, the Impossible Whopper. Strategic: tastes as good as beef, fits the flexitarian trend, less saturated fat, smaller carbon footprint. Tactical: a premium price, a steady patty supply, separate handling to avoid cross-contact, grill space.
Food trends
From the Datassential Menu Adoption Cycle. These slides were mostly images, so check the deck for exact wording.
Inception: appears in fine dining and ethnic independent restaurants
Adoption: spreads to casual independents and specialty grocers
Proliferation: chains adapt it for mainstream menus
Ubiquity: it's everywhere: quick service, grocery, family dining
Trend barriers
- Are there sourcing constraints?
- Can it be offered in an easily relatable format?
Trend enablers
- Does it work across dayparts and uses?
- Can it find new life late in the cycle?
Usually a fad
- Driven by media
- Hyper growth
- Retail is the catalyst
- Little real need
Usually a trend
- Driven by restaurants
- Organic growth
- Can spread to everyone
- Greater underlying need
Lecture 17 · Mon, Oct 26
Recipe Costing I & II
On the exam
- Q-factors: what they are and how to calculate them
- The dimensional analysis method
- Yields: APQ vs. EPQ, how to calculate, what affects yields
- Ingredient costing in each scenario: simple, conversion, yield, and conversion + yield
Key terms
- AP (as purchased): the item the way you buy it. APQ = as-purchased quantity.
- EP (edible portion): the item after trimming or peeling. EPQ = edible portion quantity.
- Yield % = EPQ ÷ APQ. Trim loss = APQ − EPQ.
- 25 lb of carrots trims down to 20.9 lb. Yield = 20.9 ÷ 25 = 83.6%. Trim loss = 4.1 lb.
- To end up with 50 lb of peeled carrots, buy 50 ÷ 0.836 = 59.81 lb.
Q-factor (wrap cost)
A fixed amount or percentage added to a recipe's cost. It covers costs that go with the recipe but aren't controlled by it:
- Free items served with the meal (bread, amuse-bouche, side dishes)
- Condiments or garnishes the guest adds
- Paper goods and containers not meant for carry-out
- Small "to taste" items (salt, pepper)
- Recipe ingredients cost $590.40. With a 3% Q-factor, the total is 590.40 × 1.03 = $608.11.
Dimensional analysis
Multiply by conversion fractions until the units you don't want cancel out.
- 0.0625 gal × (4 qt / 1 gal) × (2 pt / 1 qt) × (2 C / 1 pt) = 1 C
- 4.5 C flour × (1 lb / 3.48 C) × (16 oz / 1 lb) = 20.69 oz
What affects yields
- How the product will be used
- Its quality and condition
- Its size
- The skill and care of the person preparing it
- The equipment used
Yield estimates come from the Book of Yields, culinary texts, or online, but you should confirm them with your own tests.
It has the four costing scenarios, the worked carrot soup example, the flow chart and a calculator.
Lecture 18 · Wed, Oct 28
Recipe Costing III
On the exam
- The recipe costing flow chart. You don't need to memorize it, but you need to be able to apply it.
- Costing a short recipe from start to finish
- The recipe costing template: what data you need, and how to calculate each item
The template, column by column
Standardized recipe: the ingredient, quantity and unit the recipe calls for.
Purchasing guide details: what you pay (AP cost) and how much you get (AP quantity and unit).
Recipe converted to AP units: the recipe quantity rewritten in the unit you buy in.
Yield %: 100% if you use it the way you bought it. Otherwise, the tested yield.
Purchase quantity (APQ): converted quantity ÷ yield %.
Purchase cost: APQ × (AP cost ÷ AP quantity).
Then the financial summary
- Recipe cost = sum of all purchase costs
- Total cost = recipe cost + Q-factor
- Portion cost = total cost ÷ number of portions
- Food cost % = portion cost ÷ selling price, or selling price = portion cost ÷ target food cost %
Why cost recipes systematically
- Costings are easy to maintain and update
- It takes the guesswork out of product costs and menu pricing
- Culinary administration becomes more efficient and effective
- Every costing system, simple or complex, relies on data inputs, defined relationships, and standard procedures
Practice it
Work the carrot soup example on the Recipe costing guide, then the Recipe Costing Practice Activity on the Practice problems page. The in-class Eggs Benedict costing used the same template.
Lecture 19 · Mon, Nov 2
Menu Pricing Theory
On the exam
- The three pricing approaches and how they differ
- The modified actual cost method
- Other pricing considerations
- Cost allocation: proportional and semi-proportional (semi-proportional in detail)
What to consider when pricing
- Price elasticity of demand
- How guests perceive value
- Competition
- How the menu, prices and sales volume affect each other
- Costs and profit
- Pricing and contribution margins
The pricing approaches
Non-structured pricing just asks "what will the market bear?" The three structured methods:
Cost allocation
Proportional
Every cost is assumed to rise and fall with revenue. Each item's cost = price × that cost's % of sales. Goes with the factor price.
Semi-proportional
Some costs are the same dollar amount on every plate (fixed per cover), and some are a % of price. A cost can have both parts. Goes with the MAC price.
The worked in-class example is on the Menu pricing guide.
Lecture 20 · Wed, Nov 4
Menu Pricing Practice
On the exam
- The pricing sample problem (and HW2)
- Semi-proportional cost allocation
- The modified actual cost method
Vyba Vive: high or low price?
A higher price
Benefits: premium image and status; more profit to reinvest; no backlash from raising prices later; easier to absorb the cost of donations.
Costs: lower demand; less accessible to people who'd benefit; more one-time buyers; invites competitors to undercut.
A lower price
Benefits: signals accessibility and mission; more demand; economies of scale; more repeat buyers.
Costs: lower profit; less to reinvest; competitors may launch "better" premium products; backlash if the price rises later.
The sample problem, step by step
Food sales $500,000. Food cost 35%. Labor = $100,000 + 5% of sales. Variable costs 15%. Other fixed costs $50,000. Occupancy $22,500. Covers: 50,000. The item's food cost is $3.15.
- Factor price at 35%: 3.15 ÷ 0.35 = $9.00
- Proportional allocation at $9.00: labor 25% = $2.25 · variable 15% = $1.35 · fixed 10% = $0.90 · occupancy 4.5% = $0.405 · profit = $0.945 (10.5%)
- Fixed costs per cover: labor 100,000 ÷ 50,000 = $2.00 · other fixed 50,000 ÷ 50,000 = $1.00 · occupancy 22,500 ÷ 50,000 = $0.45
- MAC price at 12% profit: (3.15 + 2.00 + 1.00 + 0.45) ÷ (1 − (0.15 + 0.05 + 0.12)) = 6.60 ÷ 0.68 = $9.71
- Semi-proportional allocation at $9.71: labor = 2.00 + 5% × 9.71 = $2.49 · variable = 15% × 9.71 = $1.46 · fixed $1.00 · occupancy $0.45 · profit = $1.16 (12%)
Key move: labor here is mixed. The $100,000 part goes on top as $2.00 per cover. The 5% part goes on the bottom with the variable costs and profit.
Lecture 21 · Mon, Nov 9
Supply Chain, Purchasing & Receiving
On the exam
- Purchasing and procurement, and product specifications (which details matter)
- Purchasing objectives
- How businesses respond to supply chain issues
- Blockchain technology
- Receiving functions and invoice receiving
- The five distribution arrangements and how they differ
Supply chain issues
A supply chain is "the sequence of processes involved in the production and distribution of a commodity." Common problems:
- Economic: shortages and inflation
- Food safety: contaminated ingredients, improper handling, no traceability, adulteration
- Sustainability: environmental harm, transportation, packaging, waste
- Labor: unsafe conditions, child labor, exploitation
Who is responsible?
- Identify the harm: physical, economic, social, or societal.
- Decide the degree of responsibility: culpability (you caused it), complicity (from doing nothing to actively helping), capability (you have the power to fix it).
Example, the Fair Food Program: McDonald's joined and paid a small premium for tomatoes from farms that treat workers fairly. Wendy's refused, moved its sourcing, and faced a national boycott from the Coalition of Immokalee Workers.
Four ways a business can respond
| Business as… | Stance |
| Usual | The challenges are overstated, and the market is fundamentally sound. |
| Bystander | Run the company efficiently and let government handle the big problems. |
| Innovator | Business can solve problems better than government, through innovation rather than policy. |
| Activist | Business should help shape public policy that strengthens the market system. |
Transparency and blockchain
- Why transparency matters: rising foodborne illness, accountability for what you advertise, customer demand, readily available technology, quality assurance, anticipating risk.
- Takeaways: supply chains are complex. Simple doesn't mean safe. Customers want transparency. Blockchain can reduce risk by making products traceable.
The five distribution arrangements
| Type | How it works | Example |
| Broad-line | Carries almost everything. The operator orders from and pays the distributor. | Sysco, US Foods |
| Specialty supplier | Same flow, but one category (produce, seafood…) | Baldor, Clearwater Seafood |
| Purchasing co-op / GPO | Unrelated operators or franchisees buy as a group for economies of scale. Goods go through a forward warehouse. | Restaurant Operators Cooperative |
| Systems distributor | Supplies one chain's restaurants through a forward warehouse | Chain-dedicated distributors |
| Self-distributor | The company owns or leases its own warehouse and trucks, or has an exclusive delivery contract | Intracompany distribution |
Purchasing
Purchasing means getting the right product, quality, price, time and source. In small restaurants the chef or sous chef does it; large restaurants and hotels have a purchasing department.
5 purchasing objectives
- Keep supply continuous
- Minimize investment
- Maintain quality
- Get the lowest possible cost
- Protect the company's competitive position
6 receiving objectives
- Ensure quality, quantity, condition and price
- Move products quickly to storage or prep
- Help purchasing evaluate vendors
- Check the purchasing department's performance
- Serve as an accounting checkpoint (the invoice)
- Tell purchasing and production about shortages and returns
Product specifications: these slides were mostly images. A spec describes exactly what you're buying, so every vendor quotes the same thing. Typical details: product name, intended use, grade, size/count/weight, packaging, form (whole, peeled, diced), brand or origin, and delivery temperature.
Invoice receiving
Compare the driver's invoice to your purchase order at the dock.
Check price and quantity. Weigh items: always use a scale.
Check quality against your specs and grades.
Check condition: dates, tags, packaging, temperatures.
Have the driver initial any discrepancies and sign once credit memos are done.
Tell the kitchen about shortages. Date, label and store everything right away. Send the invoice to accounting.
Lectures 17–18 · mathRecipe costing guide
Every ingredient comes down to two questions: Is it in the same unit you buy it in? and Is it in the same form you buy it in?
The four scenarios
1 · Simple
Same unit, same form.
Cost = quantity × AP cost per unit.
2 · Unit conversion
Different unit, same form.
Convert to the purchase unit first, then multiply.
3 · Yield
Same unit, different form (has to be peeled, trimmed…).
APQ = EPQ ÷ yield %, then multiply.
4 · Conversion + yield
Different unit and different form.
Convert, then apply the yield, then multiply.
Common trap: if you buy it already prepped (e.g., a bag of pre-diced carrots), use 100% yield, even if the problem mentions a yield for whole carrots.
The flow chart, step by step
Pick the inventory item that matches the ingredient.
If the recipe's unit isn't the purchase unit, convert it. Then find the AP cost per unit.
If the recipe needs a different form than you bought, find the yield % and calculate APQ = EPQ ÷ yield %.
Ingredient cost = APQ × AP cost per unit.
Add up all the ingredient costs to get the recipe subtotal.
Add the Q-factor if there is one. That's the total recipe cost.
Portion cost = total recipe cost ÷ number of portions.
If you know the price, food cost % = portion cost ÷ price. If you don't, price = portion cost ÷ target food cost %.
Unit conversions
| Unit | Equals |
| 1 tablespoon (T) | 3 teaspoons (t) |
| 1 cup (C) | 16 T · 8 fl oz |
| 1 pint (pt) | 2 C · 16 fl oz |
| 1 quart (qt) | 2 pt · 4 C · 32 fl oz |
| 1 gallon (gal) | 4 qt · 16 C · 128 fl oz |
| 1 pound (lb) | 16 oz |
| 1 dozen (dz) | 12 each |
Converting volume to weight always needs a product-specific number (e.g., 1 C of diced onion = 3.9 oz). The exam gives you these.
Worked example: carrot soup
From Lectures 17–18. Makes 4 portions of 12 fl oz each.
| Ingredient | How it's costed | Cost |
| Butter, ¼ C | ¼ C = 2 oz. A $109.28 case holds 576 oz. 2 × (109.28 ÷ 576) | $0.379 |
| Onion, chopped, 1.5 C | 1.5 C × 3.9 oz = 5.85 oz. ÷ 90.6% yield = 6.46 oz. × ($51.70 ÷ 800 oz) | $0.417 |
| Carrots, chopped, 1.25 lb | 1.25 ÷ 83.6% yield = 1.495 lb. × ($16.00 ÷ 25 lb) | $0.957 |
| Chicken stock, 3 C | 3 C = 24 fl oz. × ($4.50 ÷ 128 fl oz) | $0.844 |
| Sour cream, 4 T | 4 T = 2.135 oz. × ($7.06 ÷ 80 oz) | $0.188 |
| Recipe cost | $2.786 |
| Q-factor, 5% (salt and pepper to taste) | $0.139 |
| Total recipe cost | $2.925 |
| Portion cost (÷ 4) | $0.731 |
| Food cost % at a $3.99 menu price | 18.33% |
Lectures 19–20 · mathMenu pricing guide
All three methods work the same way: costs you know in dollars divided by the share of the price that's left.
The most important skill: sort every cost
- "$X per year" or "$X per month" → divide by the year's covers and put it on top.
- "Y% of sales" → put it on the bottom.
- Mixed (e.g., labor = $350,000 + 3.7% of sales) → split it: the dollar part on top, the % part on the bottom.
- Covers for the year = covers per day × days open. Total sales = covers × average check.
In-class example (Lecture 19)
Food cost $4.00. Per cover: labor $4.48 (all fixed), other fixed $1.03, occupancy $1.38. Food cost 32%, labor 26%, variable 18%, profit 10.1%.
- Factor: 4.00 ÷ 0.32 = $12.50
- Prime cost: (4.00 + 4.48) ÷ (0.32 + 0.26) = 8.48 ÷ 0.58 = $14.62
- MAC: (4.00 + 4.48 + 1.03 + 1.38) ÷ (1 − (0.18 + 0.101)) = 10.89 ÷ 0.719 = $15.14
| Proportional at $12.50 | Semi-proportional at $15.14 |
| Food | $4.00 · 32.0% | $4.00 · 26.4% |
| Labor | $3.25 · 26.0% | $4.48 · 29.6% |
| Variable | $2.25 · 18.0% | $2.72 · 18.0% |
| Other fixed | $0.75 · 6.0% | $1.03 · 6.8% |
| Occupancy | $1.00 · 8.0% | $1.38 · 9.1% |
| Profit | $1.26 · 10.1% | $1.52 · 10.1% |
Proportional: every line = price × its %. Semi-proportional: fixed lines stay the same dollar amount per cover, and variable lines = price × %.
Review the night before
Formula sheet
Rounding: the practice sets round ingredient costs up to the next cent and percentages to one decimal place. Keep full precision until the last step.
From Prof. Adalja's posted practice setsPractice problems
Do each one on paper with a basic calculator first. The answers follow the official solutions.
Prelim 2 practice · Problem 1 · Pricing
Veal Piccata
Food cost $7.22. You expect 125 covers per day, an average check of $33.00, and 300 days open. Labor is $350,000 + 3.7% of sales. Occupancy is $6,425 per month. Fixed costs are $85,000. Variable costs are 14.5% of sales.
- Factor price at a 28% food cost
- Labor cost %, then the prime cost price
- Proportional allocation at the price from (a)
- Profit in dollars and as a %
- MAC price for an 8% profit
- Semi-proportional allocation at the price from (e)
Show answer
- a) 7.22 ÷ 0.28 = $25.79
- b) Sales = 125 × 300 × $33 = $1,237,500. Labor = 350,000 + 0.037 × 1,237,500 = $395,787.50, which is 32.0%. Covers = 37,500. Price = (7.22 + 10.55) ÷ (0.28 + 0.32) = $29.63
- c) Labor 32% = $8.25 · Variable 14.5% = $3.74 · Fixed 6.9% = $1.78 · Occupancy 6.2% = $1.60
- d) 25.79 − 7.22 − 8.25 − 3.74 − 1.78 − 1.60 = $3.20, or 12.4%
- e) (7.22 + 9.33 + 2.27 + 2.06) ÷ (1 − (0.145 + 0.037 + 0.08)) = 20.88 ÷ 0.738 = $28.29
- f) Food $7.22 (25.5%) · Labor 9.33 + 3.7% × 28.29 = $10.38 (36.7%) · Variable $4.10 (14.5%) · Fixed $2.27 (8.0%) · Occupancy $2.06 (7.3%)
Prelim 2 practice · Problem 2 · Occupancy allocation
Filet Mignon
Menu price $35. Occupancy is $4,800 per month + 3.5% of sales. Average check $56. Covers for the year: 37,905.
- Total sales
- Total occupancy cost and its % of sales
- Proportional allocation to the filet
- Semi-proportional allocation to the filet
Show answer
- a) 37,905 × $56 = $2,122,680
- b) 4,800 × 12 + 0.035 × 2,122,680 = $131,894, which is 6.21%
- c) 6.21% × $35 = $2.17
- d) 57,600 ÷ 37,905 + 3.5% × $35 = 1.52 + 1.225 = $2.74, or 7.84%
Costing practice · Q-factor
Ice cream pints
Sold in pints for $12.95. A 10-gallon batch costs $590.40 in ingredients. Add a 3% Q-factor. Find the total cost, portion cost and food cost %.
Show answer
- Total = 590.40 × 1.03 = $608.11
- 10 gal × 8 pints = 80 portions. 608.11 ÷ 80 = $7.60
- 7.60 ÷ 12.95 = 58.7%
Costing practice · Conversions
Three conversions
- 4 t of kosher salt, in oz (1 C = 6.5 oz)
- 4 qt of olive oil, in oz (1 C = 8.4 oz)
- 8 qt of heavy cream, in lb (1 C = 8.4 oz)
Show answer
- a) 4 t × (1 T / 3 t) × (1 C / 16 T) × 6.5 oz = 0.542 oz
- b) 4 qt × 4 C × 8.4 oz = 134.4 oz
- c) 8 qt × 4 C × 8.4 oz ÷ 16 = 16.8 lb
Intro to Yields
Yield problems
- A 50 lb case of potatoes becomes 39.1 lb of fries. Find the yield %, the trim loss, and the trim loss %.
- How much do you need to buy for 16 lb of diced tomatoes (78.4% yield) and 6 lb of diced onion (90.6% yield)?
- You have 25 lb of pumpkin at a 63% purée yield. Each pie needs 1.5 lb of purée. How many whole pies can you make?
- A sirloin roast weighs 13.4 lb, with a 48.6% yield for steak tips. How many lb of tips will you get?
Show answer
- a) 39.1 ÷ 50 = 78.2%. Trim loss = 10.9 lb, which is 21.8%
- b) 16 ÷ 0.784 = 20.41 lb of tomatoes. 6 ÷ 0.906 = 6.62 lb of onion
- c) 25 × 0.63 = 15.75 lb. ÷ 1.5 = 10.5, so 10 whole pies
- d) 13.4 × 0.486 = 6.51 lb
Extended item cost practice · round up to the cent
Bought prepped vs. prepped in-house
- 4 C of diced carrots (1 C = 5.6 oz). The vendor sells a 5 lb bag of already-diced carrots for $9.60.
- 5 oz of sliced green onions. You buy whole green onions, 3 lb for $7.20, at an 82.5% yield.
- 4 C of peeled, diced potatoes (1 C = 5 oz). You buy whole potatoes, 10 lb for $19.20, at a 78.1% yield.
Show answer
- a) Already diced, so the yield is 100%. 4 × 5.6 ÷ 16 = 1.4 lb × $1.92 = $2.69
- b) 5 ÷ 16 = 0.3125 lb. ÷ 0.825 = 0.3788 lb × $2.40 = $0.91
- c) 4 × 5 ÷ 16 = 1.25 lb. ÷ 0.781 = 1.60 lb × $1.92 = $3.07
Recipe costing practice activity · Lecture 17
Apple recipe: 4 portions, 5% Q-factor
- 4 oz cream cheese: $72.48 for 6 × 3 lb
- ¾ C whole milk: $2.46 per half gallon
- ⅔ C brown sugar: $24.02 for 12 × 2 lb bags (2.06 C per lb)
- 3 C bread flour: $16.39 for 50 lb (3.3 C per lb)
- 4 lb peeled, sliced apples: $35 per 40 lb case, 73.6% yield
- 1 egg: $9.27 for 15 dozen
- 1.5 T cinnamon: $7.99 for 15 oz (4 T per oz)
Find each ingredient's cost, the portion cost, the food cost % at $2.29, and the price at a 25% food cost.
Show answer
- Cream cheese $1.007 · Milk $0.231 · Sugar $0.324 · Flour $0.298
- Apples: 4 ÷ 0.736 × (35 ÷ 40) = $4.755 · Egg $0.052 · Cinnamon $0.200
- Subtotal $6.867. × 1.05 = $7.21 total. ÷ 4 = $1.80 per portion
- 1.80 ÷ 2.29 = 78.7% food cost. 1.80 ÷ 0.25 = $7.21 price
"A few more practice problems"
Prep list and batch pricing
- Find the amount to prep. Hollandaise: par 1 qt, on hand 5 C (answer in fl oz). Marinara: par ¾ gal, on hand 2.5 pt (fl oz). Eggs: par 4 dz, on hand 18 (dz).
- A soup makes 56 portions for $160.72. With a 29.4% target food cost, what's the menu price?
- Marinara sells in 16 fl oz jars for $7.95. A 10-gallon batch costs $259.84. What's the food cost %?
Show answer
- a) Hollandaise: 32 − 40 is negative, so 0 fl oz. Marinara: 96 − 40 = 56 fl oz. Eggs: 4 − 1.5 = 2.5 dz
- b) 160.72 ÷ 56 = $2.87. ÷ 0.294 = $9.77
- c) 10 gal = 80 pints. 259.84 ÷ 80 = $3.248. ÷ 7.95 = 40.9%
All lectures · 20 random questionsMixed quiz
Twenty questions drawn at random from every lecture quiz. Each retake draws a new set. I wrote these questions from the slides in the exam's style; they are not real exam questions.
Tested on Prelim 1, not Prelim 2Lectures 1–11 (background)
Prelim 2 doesn't test this material directly. A few pieces still come up inside Prelim 2 math, and those are marked below.
Still needed for Prelim 2
- Total sales = covers × average check
- Cost-to-sales % = cost ÷ sales
- Recipe scaling: conversion factor = new yield ÷ old yield
By lecture
1–2 · Introduction, history and trends
- Industry size and scope
- The restaurant's French origins, and how it differed from inns and cook shops
- The kitchen brigade and the dining room brigade
3 · Industry structure
- Limited service (LSR): snack, quick service, fast casual
- Full service (FSR): family/midscale, traditional casual, polished casual, fine dining
4 · Restaurant economics
- China's restaurant industry, how demand drives growth, customer value proposition
5–6 · Financial statements
- Business life cycle, service-profit chain, the Unidentified Restaurant case
- Who controls what: guests drive sales; managers control COGS and controllable expenses; owners control occupancy, depreciation and interest
- COGS = beginning inventory + purchases − ending inventory − employee and comp meals
7 · Performance indicators
- Average check = on-premise sales ÷ covers
- Seat turnover = covers ÷ (seats × days)
- RevPASH = on-premise sales ÷ (seats × hours × days)
- Prime cost % = (COGS + payroll + benefits) ÷ sales
- Break-even = fixed costs ÷ gross profit margin
8 · Recipe development
- Standardized recipes: components, benefits, limits
- Measured by weight, volume or count; recipe scaling
9–11 · Menu development I, guest speaker, review
- KFC China's five advantages: Chinese characteristics, second-tier cities, supply chain, service training, company-owned stores
- Guest lecture: Marc Bruno (Aramark)